University of Maroua, Cameroon.
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

Once an anthropologist sets out a fieldwork, he/she faces myriad of challenges. While it is obvious that access to the target community is related to the prevailing socio-political context, there are even more constraints when data collection is carried out using an audiovisual tool. The aim in the present article is to share the field collaboration experience with informants in the locality of Blangoua. It shows how the audiovisual tool was an actual catalysis in this process, both for knowledge creation and for the discovery of certain latent realities among the youth of Blangoua. This paper endeavors also to highlight the visual anthropologist researcher’s ambivalent position in his/her specific involvement out in research field. Thus, starting from the principle of shared anthropology (Rouch, 1968) which would like the researcher in visual anthropology to consult his informants and show them everything that is constructed as a message from their culture, we manage to detect “truths” that emerge consciously or unconsciously from the behavior of individuals.

References

  1. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (Third ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P. & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 248-261.
     Google Scholar
  3. Aull Davies, C. (2008). Reflexive Ethnography. A guide to researching selves and others (Second ed.). New York: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ayimpam, S., Chelpi-den Hamer, M., & Bouju, J. (2014). Défis éthiques et risques pratiques du terrain en situation de développement ou d’urgence humanitaire. Anthropologie & développement, 40-41, 21-41. http://journals.openedition.org/anthropodev/292
     Google Scholar
  5. Bachelard, G. (1967). La Formation de l’esprit scientifique (cinquieme ed.). Paris, France: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bouillon, F. et al. (2005). Terrains sensibles : une expérience de l’Anthropologie. Paris, France : Éditions de l’EHESS.
     Google Scholar
  7. Dionigi, A. (2001). Terrains minés. Ethnologie française, 31(1), 5-13. DOI: 10.3917/ethn.011.0005.
     Google Scholar
  8. Fatoumata, O. (2004). Une étrange familiarité. Cahiers d’études africaines, 44(175), 635-657. DOI: 10.4000/etudesafricaines.4765.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ganava, A. (2021). L’anthropologie visuelle sur un terrain sensible : l’expérience d’une étude sur la contrebande des marchandises à l’Extrême-Nord du Cameroun. L’Anthropologie visuelle au Cameroun 1990-2021: Rhumsiki, 87-104.
     Google Scholar
  10. Geertz, C. (1986). Savoir local, savoir global. Les lieux du savoir. Paris, France: PUF.
     Google Scholar
  11. Geirish, K. (1997). Being a ‘marginal native’: dilemmas of the participant observer. Nurse Researcher, 5(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.5.1.25.s4
     Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, UK: Penguins Books.
     Google Scholar
  13. Hockings, P. (ed.), (2003). Principles of visual anthropology. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     Google Scholar
  14. MacDougall, D. (2004). L’anthropologie visuelle et les chemins du savoir ». Journal des anthropologues. Association française des anthropologues, 98–99, 279–233. DOI: 10.4000/jda.1751.
     Google Scholar
  15. Mouadjamou A. (2021). Faire de l’anthropologie visuelle au Nord-Cameroun : caméra, acteur, chercheur et terrain. L’Anthropologie visuelle au Cameroun 1990-2021: Rhumsiki, 127-242.
     Google Scholar
  16. Mouadjamou, A. (2013). Visual anthropology as a means of targeting a wide audience for culture education in Cameroon. Kaliao, 2, 351-365.
     Google Scholar
  17. Olivier de Sardan, J. P. (2000). Le “je” méthodologique. Implication et explication dans l’enquête de terrain. Revue française de sociologie, 41(3), 417-445.
     Google Scholar
  18. Rouch, J. (1968). Le film ethnographique. Ethnologie générale (ed.). Paris, France: Gallimard.
     Google Scholar
  19. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, Holt: Rinehart & Winston.
     Google Scholar
  20. Tuckman B. W. (1999). Conducting Educational Research. Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
     Google Scholar