Tribhuvan University, Nepal
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

The research article aims to explore the attempt of the so-called ‘fallen women’, the socially excluded women, to revive their status in Paulo Coelho’s novel, The Witch of Portobello. The principal objective of this research is to analyze how Athena, the protagonist of the novel, exposes the female face of God in a male-dominated society, and to investigate how Athena’s relentless struggle throughout her life paves the way for rebuilding the female identity. In addition to the close reading of the text, The Witch of, through the explorative, analytical method, the research tool used to conduct this research is feminist criticism, within the conceptual frameworks of such revolutionary French feminists as Sheila Ruth, Luce Irigary and so forth. The working hypothesis is that Athena practices witchcraft to express the outrage of the whole women community who have been bearing the repression from centuries. She becomes able to prove that women are not witches but sources of creation, and hence they are equivalent to god. The chief finding is that the portrayal of Athena’s character and her struggle in The Witch of Portobello can be taken as a female’s effort to create equal status in patriarchal society avoiding the tag of witch. It is expected that researchers willing to explore Coelho further from feminist or other perspectives can take the paper as a useful reference.

References

  1. Abrams, M. H. (1999). A glossary of literary terms. (7th ed.). Earl Mcpeek,88–89.
     Google Scholar
  2. Beauvoir, S. de (1974). The second sex. Vintage Books Edition, 65–68.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bokadia, P. (2016, February 18). Review of the witch of Portobello. Wordpress. https://priyasybokadia.wordpress.com/2016/02/18/review-of-the-witch-of-portobello-by-paulo-coelho/.
     Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble; feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, 231.
     Google Scholar
  5. Callahan, B. (2008, January 24). The witch of Portobello. Amazon.co.UK Paulo Coelho: Books. https:// www.amazon.witch-portobello-pailo –coelho/dp/00613380x.
     Google Scholar
  6. Coelho, P. (2010, October 10). Paulo Coelho — Paulo Coelho writes on official site. www.paolocoelhoblog.com.
     Google Scholar
  7. Coelho, P. (2007). The witch of Portobello. Harper Collins Publishers India Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  8. Connel, R. (2005). Masculinities. Allen & Unwin, 324.
     Google Scholar
  9. Eisinger, Chester E. (1999). Coelho, Paulo. Contemporary novelists. St. James.
     Google Scholar
  10. Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender. W.W. Norton & Company, 243–246.
     Google Scholar
  11. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, 1.
     Google Scholar
  12. Goutham, P. (2007). Witch of Portobello, the Paulo Coelho reviews. https:// m.mouthshut.com.
     Google Scholar
  13. Hanisa, H. (2016). Analysis of the main character, plot and conflict in the novel the witch of Portobello’ by Paulo Coelho. S1 thesis. UniversitasMataram. https://www.krishisanskriti.org/vol_image/12Oct201802100503%20%20%20C%20%20Jothi%20%20%20%20%20%2013-16.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  14. Inezirawan (2017, February 5). Analysis of the novel, the witch of Portobello by Paulo Coelho through intrinsic approaches. https://yochebedblog.wordpress.com/2017/02/05/analysis-of-novel-the-witch-of-portobello-by-paulo-coelho-through-intrinsic-approaches/.
     Google Scholar
  15. Irigary, L. (1985). The sex which is not one. (C. Porter, Trans.). Rowman & Littlefield, 181.
     Google Scholar
  16. Julia (2007, October 30). Reviews on the witch of Portobello by Paulo Coelho. goodreads.com https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8428356.
     Google Scholar
  17. Kriesteva, J. (1985). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press, 34.
     Google Scholar
  18. Kristiani, N. and P. Ardi (2019, December). Archetypes symbolizing Athena’s personality development in The Witch of Portobello. Elite Journal, 6(2). https: //www. researchgate. net/Publication/337784406_ARCHETYPES _SYMBOLISING_ATHENA’S_PERSONALITY_DEVELOPMENT_IN_THE_WITCH_OF_PORTOBELLO
     Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. Oxford University Press, 109.
     Google Scholar
  20. Matt (2008, March 30). Start your review with the witch of Portobello. goodreads.com. https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1018790-matt.
     Google Scholar
  21. Moi, T. (1988). Feminist literary criticism. In Jefferson (Ed.), Modern literary theory. Bastford, 204.
     Google Scholar
  22. Moore, F. (2007). Witch of Portobello, the Paulo Coelho reviews. https:// m.mouthshut.com.
     Google Scholar
  23. Rich, A. (1995). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Rutgers University Press.
     Google Scholar
  24. Ruth, S. (1990). Issues in feminism: An introduction to women’s studies. Mayfield Publishing Company, 68.
     Google Scholar
  25. Ryan, H. (May 15, 2007). The witch of Portobello- Paulo Coelho-paperback. Harpercollins. https:// www.harpercollins.com.
     Google Scholar
  26. Showalter, E. (1992). Towards a feminist poetics. In H. Adams (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato. Harcourt, 447.
     Google Scholar
  27. Susan, M. (1995). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford UP, 78.
     Google Scholar
  28. Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today. Routledge, 125.
     Google Scholar
  29. Walker, A. (1984). In search of our mothers’ gardens. Hartcourt Barce Jovanovich, xi.
     Google Scholar
  30. Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. In H. Adams (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato. Harcourt.
     Google Scholar
  31. Woolf, V. (1992). A roof of our own. In H. Adams (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato. Harcourt.
     Google Scholar
  32. Youssuf, M. (2017). The witch of Portobello. Maha’s journal. https:// www.mahayoussuf.wordpress.com.
     Google Scholar